Video

The Clark Doll Experiment

The Clark Doll Experiment (1939) was an experiment done by Dr. Kenneth Clark and his wife Mamie where they asked black children to choose between a black doll and a white doll. The dolls were the same except for their skin color but most thought the white doll was nicer.

In 1954 in Brown v Board of Education the experiment helped to persuade the American Supreme Court that “separate but equal” schools for blacks and whites were anything but equal in practice and therefore against the law. It was the beginning of the end of Jim Crow.

In the experiment Clark showed black children between the ages of six and nine two dolls, one white and one black, and then asked these questions in this order: “Show me the doll that you like best or that you’d like to play with,” “Show me the doll that is the ‘nice’ doll,” “Show me the doll that looks ‘bad’,” “Give me the doll that looks like a white child,” “Give me the doll that looks like a colored child,” “Give me the doll that looks like a Negro child,” “Give me the doll that looks like you.”

“Negro” and “colored” were both common words for blacks before the 1960s.

The last question was the worst since by that point most black children had picked the black doll as the bad one. In 1950 44% said the white doll looked like them! In past tests, however, many children would refuse to pick either doll or just start crying and run away.

In one study Clark gave the test to 300 children in different parts of the country. He found that black children who went to segregated schools, those separated by race, were more likely to pick the white doll as the nice one.

In the test that he did that became part of Brown v Board he asked 16 black children in 1950 in Clarendon County, South Carolina. Of these 63% said the white doll was the nice one, the one they wanted to play with.

Clark also asked children to colour a picture of themselves. Most chose a shade of brown markedly lighter than themselves.

agirllikemeIn 2005 Kiri Davis repeated the experiment in Harlem as part of her short but excellent film, “A Girl Like Me”. She asked 21 children and 71% told her that the white doll was the nice one. Not a huge sample size, true, but it was still shocking to see how easily many chose the white doll.

In 2009 after Obama became president, “Good Morning America” on ABC did the test. They asked 19 black children from Norfolk, Virginia. It is hard to compare their numbers because they allowed “both” and “neither” as an answer. They also asked the last question first, making it far easier to answer: 88% said the black doll looked most like them.

ABC added a question too: “Which doll is pretty?” The boys said both, but 47% of the black girls said the white doll was the pretty one

Vogue’s All Black Issue

Dodai Stewart a writer for jezebel.com wrote an article called ‘Vogue All-Black-Issue; A Guided Tour’  regarding the famous issue as soon as it was released back in 2008.  Although the writer talks about the interesting images and the striking  black models featured within the pages; she also claims that between the pages of editorial content with black faces, the ads in between  continue to have white faces. Flipping  through the much-hyped issue is interesting: After the pull-out cover  featuring four striking close ups (Liya Kebede, Sessilee Lopez, Jourdan  Dunn and Naomi Campbell), the next thirteen pages of ads — for  Valentino, Prada, Gucci, Dolce & Gabbana and Dior — all feature  white faces.’ Although I understand where the  writer is coming from with this comment, the reality of this is that  Vogue is a magazine with an already established target audience and  honestly there aren’t many high end campaigns featuring black models,  therefore although the issue is supposedly to be ‘All black’ the reality is that only meant the editorials, the content within the ad’s is not  within their control and the target audience of Vogue is predominantly  Caucasian therefore they need to remain some familiarity within the  pages so they are doing something unique and diverse but still providing the readers with familiar content and ad’s that are relevant to their  taste and identity.The writer ends the article with; ‘There’s one last  “Black on Black” shoot, but it pales (heh) in comparison to the rest, so I didn’t even bother scanning it. But after counting black models on  runways and in magazines and finding them ignored by the fashion  industry, this much-anticipated issue really delivered.
Is it a gimmick? Yes. But the fact remains that  flipping through the issue and seeing page after page of gorgeous black  women can act as a reminder to editors, stylists, modelling agencies and consumers — that beauty comes in many forms. It can be edgy,  irreverent, weird, pretty, strong and avant-garde — while being black.  While perhaps some may be upset that it took a “stunt” like this to  throw a spotlight on the issue of the lack of diversity in magazines and runways, it’s actually a beautiful souvenir, a keepsake to remember  these troubled times. A protest song in photograph form. Never has the  racism issue looked quite so stunning.’ I agree with this final paragraph because of the fact that Vogue is an internationally  recognised magazine and is well respected by so many people within the  fashion/media world, I agree with Stewart when she says that this throws a spotlight on the lack of diversity issue and I think it proved to a  lot of people that beauty isn’t a particular way, it comes in all sorts  of shapes, sizes and races, and although it may considered a ‘’stunt’’  by some people, for a lot of younger people around the world it could be considered as inspiration and an eye-opener for those already within  the industry. Although I think the idea of the All-Black-Issue was  incredibly interesting, especially coming from Vogue, I think that  people often forget that the world isn’t just ‘black and white’ there  are a whole lot of races in between which aren’t recognised in not only  Vogue, but magazines across the globe, Asian women, Hispanic Women,  Mixed Raced Women and several others are completely forgotten by people  and the lack of representations of these races within magazines is  questionable and I wonder why only Caucasian and even black women, seem  to be the only ones recognised.

blk model

VOGUE ITALIA- ALL BLACK ISSUE

vogue
In July of 2008, Vogue Italia released an ‘All-Black Issue’. Vogue Italia is considered to be the best edition of Vogue there is and with a reputation as the top fashion magazine within the world and every aspiring and working model’s dream, what’s not to boast about this incredible publication? However despite the raging success of this high fashion magazine, Vogue is also known for some things which are slightly less positive, especially in the 21st century. Being such a successful and high end magazine, Vogue don’t necessarily feel the need to obey by any particular rules and whilst other magazines are becoming well known for adding women of international races across the covers of their issues, Vogue are known for using predominantly models of Caucasian backgrounds on their covers and across the pages; the lack of diversity spread across their issues is something which has becoming increasingly noticeable within the fashion and media world, so naturally when rumour had it that their July issue was to be an ‘All black Issue’ and especially as it wasn’t just Vogue, it was Vogue Italia, fashionistas all over the world held their breaths anticipating this unexpected issue and what it would contain, and naturally in true Vogue Italia style, it flew off shelves worldwide, was fabulous and completely disregarded the myth that ‘Black women on the front don’t sell magazines’. The issue had four different covers and each one sported a different model, them being; Naomi Campbell, Liya Kebede, Sessilee Lopez and London’s very own Jourdan Dunn.

model

RACIAL STEREOTYPES IN WOMENS MAGAZINES

RACIAL STEREOTYPES IN WOMENS MAGAZINES

 
In April of 2008, the same year that the Vogue Italia-All Black Issue [See below post] was released, but a few months ahead, Alex Alvarez, an associate editor wrote an article titled Model Minority: How Women’s Magazines Whitewash Different Ethnicities. Throughout the article, Alvarez basically breaks down the racial stereotype for women of different ethnicities, and talks about how each ethnic minority is portrayed in its own stereotypical way.  
On each racial background, the writer gives a ‘brief overview’ which consists of a short paragraph depicting how this particular race is represented in most fashion magazines, an ‘Ideal’ which is a woman from that ethnic background whom the fashion magazine show frequently as the ‘ideal’ woman e.g. Jennifer Lopez- the ideal Latina, a few quick points on how their skin, hair and body features should look like and then finally an ‘How magazines have fucked up’ paragraph which talks about how magazines  feed this idea of the ideal woman and the way she should look to people of that ethnic background and how it’s wrong.
During the section about black women, the writer makes, what I thought, was a very interesting the point; ‘Brief Overview: While black women can come in a variety of shapes and complexions, those who are most often represented in mainstream American magazines are often, for lack of a better, equally descriptive phrase, “white-washed” in appearance. Features that are seen of characterized of black people, like curlier hair textures, wider noses and fuller lips, are often downplayed in American magazines, conforming to a white standard of beauty. While black women are “allowed” to be more overtly sexual than those who are white, many “high fashion” black models are quite thin and thus their backsides are smaller and the object of less focus than black women represented in other areas of mainstream entertainment.’ I also believe that the idea of beauty in different races within the media differs depending on what type of media you’re looking at, stick thin black and Hispanic women on the runways of Paris versus the curvaceous black and Hispanic women seen in several music videos nowadays. As some magazines may portray Hispanic and Black Women as curvy, and exotic looking on their pages, in reality looking at most successful high fashion editorial models within the same industry and from the same racial background they are incredibly thin and even though they’re facial features and skin tones may represent those of that background, their bodies do not, yet they are still considered beautiful. In a similar way, mainstream magazines have black women on the covers who don’t necessarily have facial features which are seen as characteristics of black people, yet they have the stereotypical curvy body of a black woman, and are again considered beautiful. Therefore I think that each sector of the industry simply attempts to cater to its audience; the fashion industry by introducing models with exotic different features and diverse skin tones whereas as still conforming to the model body type and the mainstream magazine media by doing the same thing yet trying to still keep it relatable to a large percentage of the population and its audience with regards to the facial features.
One thing that particularly caught my eye within this article was that, the writer wasn’t limiting her stereotypes to the usual black versus white, however she was taking the time to regard the other races that are fairly under-represented within the fashion industry and quite frankly mostly forgotten about. ‘Brief Overview: Asian women hold a curious place in the beauty stratum. Often, what is perceived as their “natural” physical traits are encouraged and often emulated by White women trying to achieve a certain standard of beauty? The idea of a natural physical ideal is a harmful one, because those who do not possess such traits are ignored or considered somehow inferior, physically. The Asian ideal, as perceived by American fashion magazines and elsewhere, revolves around the idea that one must be petite, slim, fair and delicate. Doll-like would be the best way to describe this ideal, both in terms of physical appearance and attitude.’ To me the point about Asian women was the one that made me think the most, I thought this one was probably the truest one in the bunch, because with the previous two we could almost argue that not all black/Hispanic women are portrayed like this in magazines, however with the Asian ‘brief overview’ I found myself struggling to think of a time that I had opened a magazine and seen an Asian woman, which is rare, who isn’t portrayed in this stereotypical way. After reading this I noticed that almost Asian women in fashion magazines are portrayed as this youthful doll-like image, which makes their features seem even more striking and incredible yet almost surreal in a sense. I also noticed that all the Asian models seemed to have incredibly pale skin and petite figures, yet in reality, with the Asian people I know, they seem to have a slightly more tanned skin tone and as within any race come in array of different body shapes as the writer also expresses  ‘Some Asian girls are chubby. Really! Some are muscular, some are tall, some are dark, some are doughy, and some are boney and awkward.’ The ‘brief overview’ made me wonder whether this is just the western idea of Asian beauty, or if Asian women themselves also strive to look this way?
The most surprising racial stereotype however was the one about white women- ‘Brief Overview: The gold standard of white beauty is a woman who is thought of as being the least “ethnic” and most “neutral” as possible. Fair skin, fair hair and thin, often lacking in curves that would be considered vulgar or distasteful (or exotic?) the stereotype of corn-fed Midwestern girls or sun-kissed, muscular athletic girls are eschewed for fair, tall, boney girls – often with what is described as a “boyish” figure, one without the tell-tale markers of womanhood – hips, ass. Personality. Irish-Americans, for example, who are today almost synonymous with the concept of what it means to be white (fevered dancing without the use of hips or shoulders, the consumption of potatoes), were very much “the other” for a very, very long time in America. Jewish and Italian Americans were also not always considered white folks here in the old U.S. of A. This isn’t mentioned to encourage anyone to wait whiteness out, it’s meant to highlight the fact that whiteness is a culturally manufactured concept and is only given meaning by a certain segment of society in a certain slice of history.’ I feel like we as a generation are so used to seeing white women dominate the pages of our high fashion magazines that we don’t seem to notice that it’s always the same type of pretty white blonde girl next door we see. The idea of the ‘perfect white women’ seems so bizarre to us, yet this article actually educated me a lot about opening my eyes and realising that every race has its own underlying pressures from people within their own race and people outside their own race to look a certain way and conform to a particular stereotype.
I personally feel like despite this being a good article the writer has failed to realize the fact that women’s magazines now feature all types of people, from actresses to singers and not just models, and therefore now the whole magazine industry is a business a way for people to promote themselves through being on the cover of a big name mag, and so we can’t just point the finger in the direction of the editors and say they’re the racist ones, and they’re the ones creating these stereotypes, I think the problem lies a lot deeper than that.
All in all although I didn’t agree with all the points the writer made, and the way in which she made them, it made me question my whole outlook onto the whole ‘Racism within the fashion Industry’ debate, are the fashion industry still racist if they prefer a pretty tanned blonde girl to a pretty pale-skinned ginger girl? Or if they put a stick thin light-skinned black woman on the cover of their magazine as opposed to a dark skinned curvy woman? I think the real question is are they simply giving us what we really want to see?
Source:[Read the full article here on racialicious.com [http://www.racialicious.com/2008/04/10/model-minority-how-womens-magazines-whitewash-different-ethnicities/]] April 10th 2008.

Sooo..What’s this about??

women
The purpose of my blog is to focus on the various interpretations that the media and society have on women specifically culture barriers. My goal is to promote women empowerment and an equal understanding of cultural differences. The things that I will post, will not only be informative, descriptive and a little bold in the manner that I plan to bring awareness of issues or societal norms that are in existence within all cultures of women.